[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: An inquiry into the nature of XML and how it orients ourpe
On 2009-11-20, at 10:56 PM, rjelliffe@allette.com.au wrote: > The use of classes and subclasses is characteristic but not definitive of > an object-oriented system. An object-oriented system is merely one where > all the characteristics of a thing (typically methods and fields) are > bundled, and where most or all things are objects. Ever since Day 0, I've been uncomfortable with the notion that there's anything O-O about XML. It seems to me at a pretty deep level that O-O is about hiding and encapsulation; an object is a thing that can do some things on demand, don't bother your pretty little head about how it's done. It seems to me like XML is oriented exactly 180° in the opposite direction: Here's the data, here are some labels for the data, here are some ordering and containment relationships, you're free to do whatever you want with it. That's a good thing and (I've always the big win) - the provider doesn't constrain what the receiver does. -Tim
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|