[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML spec and XSD
> Undoubtedly XSD could have been better, but if your requirements are met by > what it offers then there's no real motivation to use some other approach. For the work I've done, XSD with xs:assert and xs:alternative covers most things (roll on XSD 1.1!)... If someone is considering which schema language to use on a project today, surely XSD is the still the right choice with 1.1 around the corner (or just use it now with Saxon)? XSD 1.1 vs RNG / Schematron / Whatever is a more worthwhile discussion, the debate involving 1.0 has been done to death, and will be out of date soon. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|