[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Failed XML standards

  • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
  • To: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com>
  • Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:57:31 -0800

Re:  Failed XML standards
Would you say that a new basic text book about XML should hardly
mention XInclude, XLink, and XPointer at all, at least not in whole
chapters, but maybe in some paragraph in a chapter about failed
standards?

Cautionary tales perhaps. All thee of these are link manifestations, and as such added not only expectations of semantics but also expected functionality that didn't effectively exist in a comprehensive factor in the distributed environment of the web c. 2000. XPointer was an early (and unsuccessful) stab at a query language for the web - it would take another seven years for XQuery to effectively replace it. XInclude works effectively in the closed environment of an XML database, but the possibility of recursive XIncludes made this a much more difficult domain problem in a distributed environment. Simple links already existed for most languages with implied semantics, and more complex links ultimately were made redundant with RDF and later OWL.

In other words, they failed either because they placed too many demands upon existing infrastructures, because they were shortly superceded by better technologies, or because solutions based upon them often proved to add more complexity than they solved (think Link Bases in XBRL).


Kurt Cagle
Managing Editor
http://xmlToday.org


On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@gmail.com> wrote:
As we all know on this list, the XML article in Wikipedia contains the
following:

"Some other specifications conceived as part of the "XML Core" have
failed to find wide adoption, including XInclude, XLink, and
XPointer."

But what does it mean?

Probably all text books about XML have a chapter dedicated to each of
those standards.

Would you say that a new basic text book about XML should hardly
mention XInclude, XLink, and XPointer at all, at least not in whole
chapters, but maybe in some paragraph in a chapter about failed
standards?

Cheers,
Jesper Tverskov

http://www.xmlkurser.dk
http://www.xmlplease.com

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.