[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Serialization of XDM - Use cases / Proposal

  • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
  • To: "'David A. Lee'" <dlee@calldei.com>
  • Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:36:47 +0100

RE:  Serialization of XDM - Use cases / Proposal

The first question I have in mind is how do we parse this.  This one example of Michaels has me a little confused:

    <xsl:sequence select="xs:positiveInteger('5')"/>

This is the proposal for how to represent a typed atomic value.    This is pretty obscure to my novice eyes.  Reading this I wouldn't guess off hand that this means "Atomic value, type xs:positiveInteger, text value '5'". 
 
Well, I think it's merit is that it's familiar syntax and semantics for anyone who knows XSLT 2.0 or wants to go and read the spec. For many purposes, however, a more convenient syntax would be <atomicValue value="5" type="xs:positiveInteger"/>.  


That then leads me to the final question.  Suppose we transform this serialized form "almost an xslt" format, into "real xslt" format, then
run a real XSLT 2.0 parser on it.  How to get the resulting values out ?

Please bear with me as I'm very much a novice at XSLT ... maybe the answer is "obvious".
XSLT 2.0 claims that the result of an XSLT transformation can be a 'set of result trees'.
Thats an XDM sequence . (???)
 
No: XQuery can produce any XDM sequence as output (well, almost any - it can't for example generate unparsed entities); but XSLT can only produce a set of document nodes. You can write an xsl:function to produce any XDM sequence as its result, but you would need a processor-specific way of invoking the function and capturing its result in the external environment.
 
Incidentally, I was reminded of this project in some work with a client yesterday. They are running MarkLogic queries and feeding the result into Saxon, currently via lexical XML (it has to be serialized because it's on a different machine). In this kind of scenario it would be nice to transfer a typed document, but we really don't want a five-fold increase in document size over the lexical XML. Size does matter.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.