[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Wikipedia on XML
On Aug 23, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > Were we starting over today, I would argue strongly in favor of > eliminating the internal DTD subset entirely and leaving the > definition of the schema language outside the spec so that the DOCTYPE > could point to schemas in different languages which parser vendors > would be free to implement or not as they chose. Agreed, and I'd go further; I'd totally eliminate <!DOCTYPE>. Frankly, I have no interest in an instance's opinion about which schemas it thinks are relevant. The nice thing about XML is I, the receiver, decide how best to validate or otherwise process. -T
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|