[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
X509v3 vs. X509PKIPathv1 in signature part in WSS / SOAP messagesecurity
- From: Shlomo Yona <S.Yona@F5.com>
- To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:07:32 -0700
Hello,
I
wonder how popular is the usage of ValueType=”http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-x509-token-profile-1.0#X509PKIPathv1” vs. the usage of ValueType=”http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-x509-token-profile-1.0#X509v3 ” in BinarySecurityToken elements.
Apparently, the former is more popular than the latter. Is your experience in
the ``field’’ too?
Thanks.
Shlomo
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0 |
|
Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|