[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RE: Namespace use cases

• From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
• To: "XML Developers List" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
• Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:39:39 -0400

Just a quick comment on one of your points, Rick.

At 2009-07-11 20:06 +1000, rjelliffe@allette.com.au wrote:
>The second is the namespaces used for Qnames in element and attribute
>values. XSLT went one way, but I think it is the wrong way because it
>fudges the difference between data and markup. Schematron has explicit
>elements and this has been very smooth: developers don't worry about
>default namespaces, they only need to look in a single place.

I long regret the Schematron choice of using elements for declaring 
namespaces and their prefixes.  In every other application of XML I 
use the namespace axis and namespace facilities to obtain the 
information I need to support XPath addresses that are in attribute 
values, but for Schematron I have to do something different than for 
everything else.  So now instead of looking in a single place for 
namespaces (the namespace axis) I now have to look in a second place 
(the newly-introduced Schematron elements).

I've always been uncomfortable with that.  I do not find it "smooth" at all.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken


--
XQuery/XSLT/XSL-FO hands-on training - Oakland, CA, USA 2009-08-03
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/
Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video
Video lesson:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg&fmt=18
Video overview:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE&fmt=18
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: Namespace use cases
    • From: rjelliffe@allette.com.au

• References:
  • XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>
  • Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>
  • RE: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
  • Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
  • RE: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Do namespaces address all use cases well
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
  • Namespace use cases
    • From: Micah Dubinko <micah.dubinko@marklogic.com>
  • RE: Namespace use cases
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
  • Re: RE: Namespace use cases
    • From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>
  • RE: RE: Namespace use cases
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Re: RE: Namespace use cases
    • From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>
  • Re: RE: Namespace use cases
    • From: rjelliffe@allette.com.au