[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RE: Namespace use cases

• From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>
• Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:27:28 +1000

Jim Tivy wrote:
>  
> What ever happened to the compound document?
>   
The two major document formats used by the current generation of office 
suite programs both are compound document formats, and both are 
multiple-namespace formats (which is a different thing than a compound 
document,)  

At some time, when the tipping point is reached with enough installed 
systems that can produce and use and consume the formats. it will stop 
being prudent to avoid them.  We just need to make sure the standards 
are good enough by the time they are needed.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe


 

• References:
  • XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>
  • Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
  • Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: rjelliffe@allette.com.au
  • Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
  • Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: Laurens van den Oever <laurens@xopus.com>
  • Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>
  • RE: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
  • Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
  • RE: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
  • Do namespaces address all use cases well
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>
  • Namespace use cases
    • From: Micah Dubinko <micah.dubinko@marklogic.com>
  • RE: Namespace use cases
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@bluestream.com>