[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations
Chuck Bearden wrote: > The underlying concern was for the robustness of RDFa, and I was > responding to a question from my project manager. Ah, thanks for clarifying. Yes, RDFa is definitely not alone in this regard. XSLT and W3C XML Schemas both use QNames in content (or attribute values). And new specifications often use them; my most recent encounter with them was in implementing Inline XBRL, which uses them pervasively. To quote the TAG: "Whatever the architectural ramifications of using QNames as identifiers in contexts other than XML element and attribute names, it is already established practice. It is simply not practical to suggest that this usage should be forbidden on architectural grounds."[1] Evan [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids#sec-archobs
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|