[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Convention versus standard

• From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
• Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:32:39 +0200

I think another implicit quality of convention is that it is something
that is arrived at over a time-period, if you argue that something is
a convention, that is to say <emphasize>established</emphasize> by
common practice, then it follows with good enough analysis of the
communications of that community that you should be able to track when
practices that are propounded as best by leading members of the
community move to a state of being conventional.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...> wrote:
>
>> A convention or best practice would be putting a namespace
>> dictionary or document at the location indicated by the namespace
> URI.
>
> Ah, that's a good one Len!
>
>> A convention or best practice
>
> Is a convention the same thing as a best practice?
>
> /Roger
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>

• References:
  • Convention versus standard
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • RE: Convention versus standard
    • From: "Len" <cbullard@h...>
  • RE: Convention versus standard
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>