[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
Michael Kay wrote: > There aren't two languages for defining integrity constraints in SQL > databases, or for defining assertions in Java; why should there be two for > defining validation constraints in XML documents? The scope is sufficiently > narrow that one language ought to be enough. Hmm... I don't think I'd ever call the scope of anything in XML "narrow", even from a strictly programming perspective. I marvel at the infinite number of ways people have found to use XML, and their ever-changing expectations for how to process it. Variety is a good thing here. Thanks, Simon St.Laurent http://simonstl.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|