[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
Elliotte Harold wrote: > > I would suggest a putative XML 2.0 follow roughly Tim Bray's skunkworks > proposals. Specifically I'd like to see: > > 3. Expand the list of predefined entity references to include what's > defined in HTML and MathML. Elliotte. You mutter about Unicode changes/stability, just how stable is this set of entities? Could this be handled in the same way that you propose for Unicode version attributes? I.e. define them outside of xml 2.0 and reference the 'set' in use with the version of xml? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|