[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Ten Years Later - XML 1.0 Fifth Edition?
Agreed. No standard for markup of living systems should. The beauty of XML is it can be jiggered to do any language if you want to build in data types or special character entities of various kinds. The question is who has to use those? The case being made for entities is once again to grandfather HTML first, those being sets in widespread use. That makes the call statistical favoring the largest bodies of users first followed by local sets at some point of isolation from the largest cluster. Isolates are lost. len From: Pete Cordell [mailto:petexmldev@c...] So the Cherokee and other language speakers have to be a bit patient while the changes flush through the system before they can assume that the Cherokee XML languages will interoperate smoothly. However, I think that is a better situation than the W3C dictating that all those language speakers will never be able to use their preferred language. Regards, Pete [1] http://recycledknowledge.blogspot.com/2008/02/which-characters-are-excluded- in-xml.html [2] http://norman.walsh.name/2008/02/07/xml105e -- Pete Cordell Codalogic
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|