[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: ten years later, time to repeat it?
----- Original Message From: "Eric van der Vlist" > When people say "XML is hard", they usually do not mean "XML 1.0 is > hard" but "XML 1.0 + namespaces in XML + XPath + DOM + XSLT + W3C XML > Schema + XML Base + xml:id + XInclude + XPointer + ... is hard" and the > proportion of criticism that goes to XML 1.0 itself is usually pretty > low. In other words, I don't think that subsetting only XML 1.0 (or even > only XML 1.0 + namespaces) would be very useful. So I'm wondering, what do others think of as XML when Simon says "...creating a subset of XML..."? Pete Cordell Codalogic Visit http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/ for XML C++ data binding
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|