[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XPath 2.0 Best Practice Issue: Graceful Degradation
Thanks, for the clarification, helps if I look at the correct specification. Dave David Carlisle wrote: >> One thing I think we need to clarify here, is that the above itself is >> not just an XPATH statement. >> > > yes it is, Xpath 2.0 (see subject line) > > >> XPATH it self can do some AND/OR/NOT logic, but not if-then-else >> logic. >> > > XPath 2 has if, with the syntax that Roger used. > > David > > ________________________________________________________________________ > The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England > and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: > Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. > > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is > powered by MessageLabs. > ________________________________________________________________________ > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|