[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Is Schematron (using XPath 2.0) functionally a superset of

• From: "Stephen Green" <stephengreenubl@g...>
• To: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:59:58 +0000

On 13/11/2007, Fraser Goffin <goffinf@g...> wrote:
> > (If you asked an analyst which was simpler to understand, the assertions
> > in bullet list form, or the XSD pretty printed, I bet the assertions
> > would win.)
>
> maybe, although this rather depends on the analyst, and, that represents
> another whole class of factors which may drive a decision when choosing
> technology.

Can a tool create an example instance from the
assertions just as it can from the XSD?


-- 
Stephen Green

Partner
SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is Schematron (using XPath 2.0) functionally a superset of XML Schemas?
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>

• References:
  • Re: Is Schematron (using XPath 2.0) functionally a superset ofXML Schemas?
    • From: noah_mendelsohn@u...
  • Re: Is Schematron (using XPath 2.0) functionallya superset of XML Schemas?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Is Schematron (using XPath 2.0) functionally a superset of XML Schemas?
    • From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>