[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS
The problem is knowing where a controversy is genuine or manufactured. If the only rule is non-controversy, very few standards would pass. Anyone remember just how controversial XSD was (still is in some circles) or XML Namespaces? len From: Robin Cover [mailto:robin@o...] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 8:41 AM Thanks for providing context, Michael. You're right: the commentary surrounding the INCITS balloting situation obscures the fact that INCITS' decision is (probably) relevant only to the US vote, one of many. Robin On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Michael Kay wrote: > I haven't seen any evidence that the US decision will influence the many > other national standards bodies who will also be voting. Since the whole > point about the fast-track process is that it's only supposed to be used > when things are uncontroversial, I would have thought many countries will > vote no purely on that basis. > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|