[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Is it time for the binary XML permathread to start up aga

• From: "Alexander Philippou" <alex@n...>
• To: "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:05:29 +0300

> 4. Encode the XML document a Fast Infoset file, and then send 
> the FI file.

As a message encoding for communications, Fast Infoset is considerably more
efficient than text. If you have an infoset in memory and want to serialize
it for transmission then FI offers you compactness, better performance and
is nicely interoperable too. FI-encoded OVAL docs (for example... :) are a
quarter of the size of text-encoded OVAL docs. And since the processing
penalty of compression is proportional to doc size, using FI instead of text
makes sense even when doing http+gzip.

However if you already have a text-encoded file in your hands and just want
to send it to the other side, gzipping it is probably the best option of
all.

> /Roger

Alexander

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Is it time for the binary XML permathread to start up again?
    • From: noah_mendelsohn@u...

• References:
  • RE: Is it time for the binary XML permathread to start up again?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>