[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Is it time for the binary XML permathread to start up aga

• From: "Alexander Philippou" <alex@n...>
• To: <noah_mendelsohn@u...>,"'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:33:04 +0300

> If gzip is going to make the FI form larger, or not much
> smaller, then 
> it's a bad use of time to run it, even if the time to gzip the FI is 
> indeed much lower than the time to gzip the original text.

Generally, compressing FI results in similar or smaller size than
compressing text. So the FI benefits are there both w/ and w/o compression.
Take the 27 files in MITRE / OVAL / Platform Data File Downloads as an
example:

text: 16,271,427 bytes
fi: 4,171,861 bytes (ratio 1:0.26)
text+gzip: 1,082,750 bytes (ratio 1:0.07)
fi+gzip: 867,648 bytes (ratio 1:0.05)

> Noah Mendelsohn

Alexander

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Is it time for the binary XML permathread to start up again?
    • From: noah_mendelsohn@u...

• References:
  • RE: Is it time for the binary XML permathread to start up again?
    • From: noah_mendelsohn@u...