[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: a namespace definitions related question(s)

• From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:55:11 +0000 (GMT)

In article <B546C312A37C12438A22154026CDC7E011530737@e...> you write:

>> > In the XML instance that I posted:
>> > * is the document well formed?

>If the XML processor that processes the XML document that I gave as
>example is also validating and is namespace aware what is the correct
>answer?

Namespace and schema processing can't make a not-well-formed document
well-formed.  It has to be well-formed XML before you do either of
those things.

-- Richard
-- 
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.

• References:
  • RE: a namespace definitions related question(s)
    • From: "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F...>