[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: XML design of ((a and b) or c)

• From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: "Mitch Amiano" <mitch.amiano@a...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:15:58 +0000

It does indeed... The Ant markup is to achieve a true/false result,
whereas I'm trying to model the items that make up an order, so the
result would be a set of elements.

It works for both, I think, so that's fine.

On 12/13/06, Mitch Amiano <mitch.amiano@a...> wrote:
> By the way, that's how ANT markup does it too.
>
> Andrew Welch wrote:
> > I wrote:
> >> (a and b) or c
> >>
> >> could be designed as:
> >>
> >> <or>
> >>     <a>
> >>     <and>
> >>         <b/>
> >>         <c/>
> >>     </and>
> >> </or>
> >
> > ...or more correctly:
> >
> > <or>
> >  <and>
> >    <a/>
> >    <b/>
> >  </and>
> >  <c/>
> > </or>
> >
> > :)
>
>

• References:
  • XML design of ((a and b) or c)
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: XML design of ((a and b) or c)
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Re: XML design of ((a and b) or c)
    • From: Mitch Amiano <mitch.amiano@a...>