[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: SGML complexity
Michael Kay wrote: > Unfortunately, I think it also kneecapped the free software market to some > extent. It's noticeable how few of the XSLT 1.0 vendors are producing a > version 2.0 product, and in most cases I think the problem is that it's > difficult to produce a business case for developing free software. I think it has at least something to do with whether 2.0 is actually useful. Certainly in Jaxen (which only does XPath, not even full XSLT) nobody working on the project sees what they'd gain by releasing a 2.0 version. The data model is a cleaner, and they're quite a few extra functions; but mostly 1.0 does everything we need it to do. While there's certainly a lot of value in 2.0, there are also a number of questionable items. The bar for fully implementing it is just way too high to interest a lot of folks. Had 1.1 been pushed out the door first, I think essentially all active implementations would have been upgraded. Had 2.0 followed with an improved data model, but without all the schema baggage and perhaps with a somewhat smaller function library, I think most vendors would have made the jump again. However there's just so much in XSLT 2 that the sheer size of the project is daunting. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@m... Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|