[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
Le vendredi 07 juillet 2006 à 08:07 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) a écrit : > From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:vdv@d...] [...] > >The Web hasn't chosen W3C XML Schema. > > Yes it has. See the W3C specifications. So what? The Web doesn't belong to the W3C. [...] > >If we spoke about the Web, I wouldn't bet on W3C XML Schema! There is a > tendency in the Web technology stack to reject > >over complex specs and I am not sure at all that W3C XML Schema will > ever be widely used on the Web. > > There is a tendancy on the web to burgle the work of others and call > that invention. RELAX NG is original work. The web didn't invent it > and so far hasn't embraced it. A few intelligent developers have but > find they can't get it adopted by the web. Isn't that what these Spy vs > Spy threads are really about? You want it. You can't have it. A > minority opinion has been effectively stifled. What speaks louder, > the web or powerful monied interests? See OpenDoc and Microsoft. Has > the web caused the the initiation of a plugin project by Microsoft? > Nope. Governments have. Large procurements have. Deep pockets have. > Did they listen to the web? Maybe, but in the end, it comes down to > directed self-interest, not an abstraction of community. ??? > You want better? Do what you are doing. Stand up for it in the town > square but don't whine that the will of the web is being stifled because > that spits in the face of the very crowd you say you support. When have I whined? > >That being said, I agree that W3C XML Schema is dominant in the crowd > of "XML enterprise developers" but that's a > > relatively small community compared to the Web community. > > XML Schema dominates the tool stacks and that group of developers is by > far larger than the users of RELAX. Sure. My point was that a much more larger group do not use any schema at all, which also means that the outcome is still open. Anyway, I am completely lost in this discussion. I fail to see the relation between 80% of your previous mail and the mail to which it was supposed to answer and in the remaining 20% I see a majority of rather arbitrary assertions... I propose to stop the thread at this point! Eric -- GPG-PGP: 2A528005 Le premier annuaire des apiculteurs 100% XML! http://apiculteurs.info/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|