[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG
>Which style >and which language does the teacher attempt to use to communicate with the >students? Lisp? (sorry, couldn't resist) Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen On 7/27/06, sterling <sstouden@t...> wrote: > > Pardon the interuption but your post presents differences do exist > between individuals in preference of one way over another way > (alternative ways) of doing something. Hence the technically best way may > fit the users preferred style? > > This might contribute to Visible Web XML inhibition. > > Has anyone played around with "preferences" as a programming target. > It would be really helpful to the long run if a classification system > could be developed to code delivery styles used in a software package so > that users could anticipate their ability to cope with them. > > In learning science we call it "learning channels". I call it the > one teacher twenty student problem: several students speak only Spanish, a > few speak only French, two are deaf, 3 are without eyesight, one is 12 > years old, two are 65 years old, and the minority are normal average > students (whatever that is) and each student prefers one teaching style to > another. Two of the students are children of the principal, one is rich, > most are poor, and until this hour none have been in a class together. > For this hour the teacher has a choice of 13 teaching styles. Which style > and which language does the teacher attempt to use to communicate with the > students? > > sterling > > On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, bryan rasmussen wrote: > > > Well, Relax-NG IMHO is easier to write, and provides better > > extensibility mechanisms for ones dialect so even for data oriented > > xml I suppose it is better. The only way it wouldn't be better would > > be if people are interested in exchanging mechanisms via SOAP based > > WebServices and have decided that they need all the overhead required > > for that - for example, XSD, WSDL, maybe WS-* even... > > > > Please note that I don't understand why anyone would make that > > decision although I see it made quite often. > > > > MVH > > Bryan Rasmussen > > > > On 7/27/06, Pete Cordell <petexmldev@t...> wrote: > > > Relevant to discussions earlier this month... Is the tide turning? > > > > > > For background, IETF's XCON effort is for controlling operations within a > > > videoconference, for example participants' audio gains, side bar > > > conversations etc. > > > > > > I think the proposal follows a similar move in the ECRIT group (which I'm > > > not familiar with). > > > > > > XCON seems very data oriented, but I've heard that Relax NG is not suited to > > > this. > > > > > > Mull? > > > > > > Pete. > > > -- > > > ============================================= > > > Pete Cordell > > > Tech-Know-Ware Ltd > > > for XML to C++ data binding visit > > > http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx > > > (or http://www.xml2cpp.com) > > > ============================================= > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Adam Roach" <...> > > > To: "XCON-IETF" <xcon@i...> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:18 PM > > > Subject: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG > > > > > > > > > > Spurred by the output from the data model editing session, the working > > > > group members present at the IETF 66 meeting of XCON discussed the > > > > potential use of Relax NG instead of Schema for defining the XCON data > > > > model. > > > > > > > > Among participants in the discussion, there was strong agreement to use > > > > Relax NG for the XCON data model. > > > > > > > > This message is to confirm that this direction has the consensus of the > > > > mailing list. Any objections to the decision should be raised promptly on > > > > the XCON mailing list. > > > > > > > > /a > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > XCON mailing list > > > > XCON@i... > > > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > > > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > > > > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > > > manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php> > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > > manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php> > > > >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|