[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG
• From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:52:08 +0100

Relevant to discussions earlier this month...  Is the tide turning?

For background, IETF's XCON effort is for controlling operations within a 
videoconference, for example participants' audio gains, side bar 
conversations etc.

I think the proposal follows a similar move in the ECRIT group (which I'm 
not familiar with).

XCON seems very data oriented, but I've heard that Relax NG is not suited to 
this.

Mull?

Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
                         for XML to C++ data binding visit
                         http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
                         (or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
=============================================

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adam Roach" <...>
To: "XCON-IETF" <xcon@i...>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:18 PM
Subject: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG


> Spurred by the output from the data model editing session, the working 
> group members present at the IETF 66 meeting of XCON discussed the 
> potential use of Relax NG instead of Schema for defining the XCON data 
> model.
>
> Among participants in the discussion, there was strong agreement to use 
> Relax NG for the XCON data model.
>
> This message is to confirm that this direction has the consensus of the 
> mailing list. Any objections to the decision should be raised promptly on 
> the XCON mailing list.
>
> /a
>
> _______________________________________________
> XCON mailing list
> XCON@i...
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG
    • From: Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...>
  • Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: "XMLSON" Idea.
• Next by Date: Re: Schema question, now how to use under CLAX ?Command-line-architecture-(for)XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Streaming Validation for XML: STX goes Schematron
• Next by thread: Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread