[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win
The RELAX NG versus XSD competition is bogus, consequently treating one as the winner and one as the loser at this stage is bogus. They are both grammar languages, and in many cases you can substitute one for the other. In fact, it seems that people rarely use the features in one that are not also not in the other, at least for public schemas. See http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2006/04/reconciling_xsd_and_relax_ng.html for a reference to Expressiveness and Complexity of XML Schemas <http://alpha.uhasselt.be/%7Elucg5503/tods2006.pdf> by Martens, Neven, Schwentick and Jan Bex which has a lot of material of interest. (You might even interpret that survey as saying that people are *not* buying into the exotic parts of XSD. I'd expect the same of RELAX NG.) People using DTDs, XSD or RELAX NG are all buying into grammars, with all that entails. I know I have a much more XPath versus grammar viewpoint than many people, but I think grammars, whether DTD, XSD or RELAX NG, will play a decreasingly important part in document processing (perhaps XQuery/XLinq/XSLT2 will cause a momentary hump due to vendors trying to find markets for their shiny new tools) in the medium term. Cheers Rick Jelliffe
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|