[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visib

• To: juanrgonzaleza@c...
• Subject: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 21:11:29 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <4327.217.124.69.245.1153591159.squirrel@w...>
• References: <B8415163A689094689542C617ECA0366E03F8C@I...> <3482.217.124.69.228.1153560442.squirrel@w...> <44C26242.9030206@k...> <4327.217.124.69.245.1153591159.squirrel@w...>
• Reply-to: davep@d...

On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 10:59 -0700, juanrgonzaleza@c...
wrote:

> GIF, JPEG... [other format] is prefered over XMLs as SVG.

SVG is XML?
What does your sentence mean?
Who prefers image formats over XML... and for what?

> 
> Then when anyone is using GIFs, JPEGs for tasks SVG was designed is she/he
> wrong? Or maybe she/he cannot SVG.

SVG isn't a verb. 
There is no right or wrong surely?
It's a choice we make.
Right or wrong is subjective.

> 
> >> CSS is prefered over XSLT.
> >
> > For what? It doesn't much sense to process HTML by XSLT for styling
> > purposes. So of course there are more CSS files on web then XSLT files,
> > because there is more content in HTML then in raw XML.
> 
> Mistake CSS is prefered over XSL-FO.

Again, by whom? For what purpose?



> 
> Whow! Then XSL-FO is not for the visible web.

No. Nor was it meant to be for (this threads definition) of the visible
web.
PDF|ps perhaps is (same context).

Your arguments aren't making much sense Juan.


> 
-- 
Regards, 

Dave Pawson
XSLT + Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>

• References:
  • [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• Next by Date: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• Previous by thread: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• Next by thread: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread