XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - July, 2006

• RDF Graph Modelling Language, bryan rasmussen
• How we can convert pdf data into xml?, chhaon dhoop
  • RE: How we can convert pdf data into xml?, Michael Kay
  • Re: How we can convert pdf data into xml?, David Lyon
• How to embed xml in an html file, and parse the file using Sax?, Anil Philip
  • Re: How to embed xml in an html file, and parse the file using Sax?, Mukul Gandhi
• Well, time for RDF, bryan rasmussen
• Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG, Pete Cordell
  • Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG, bryan rasmussen
    • Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG, sterling
      • Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG, bryan rasmussen
      • Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG, Tei
      • Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG, Rick Marshall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG, Tei
      • Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG, sterling
      • Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG, Rick Marshall
  • Re: Fw: [XCON] Consensus 66-03: Schema vs RelaxNG, Tatu Saloranta
• Re: Streaming Validation for XML: STX goes Schematron, Trapp, Tobias
• "XMLSON" Idea., Tei
  • Re: "XMLSON" Idea., David Lyon
    • Re: "XMLSON" Idea., Tahir Hashmi
    • Re: "XMLSON" Idea., Tei
      • Re: "XMLSON" Idea., Pete Kirkham
      • Re: "XMLSON" Idea., David Lyon
      • Re: "XMLSON" Idea., Tei
  • Re: "XMLSON" Idea., Robin Berjon
• Towards s-expression based XPath/XSLT implementation, Oleg A. Paraschenko
• Re: Schema question, Melvin Chin
  • Re: Schema question, Alex Stankovic
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Schema question, Chiusano Joseph
• Re: how to design an HTML file to contain an XML file?, Anil Philip
  • Re: how to design an HTML file to contain an XML file?, Tei
    • Re: how to design an HTML file to contain an XML file?, Anil Philip
  • RE: how to design an HTML file to contain an XML file?, Didier PH Martin
    • RE: how to design an HTML file to contain an XML file?, Anil Philip
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: how to design an HTML file to contain an XML file?, Anil Philip
    • Re: how to design an HTML file to contain an XML file?, Tei
      • Re: how to design an HTML file to contain an XML file?, Anil Philip
• Schema question, Alex Stankovic
  • RE: Schema question, Chiusano Joseph
  • Re: Schema question, David Lyon
    • Re: Schema question, Danny Vint
    • Re: Schema question, Alex Stankovic
  • RE: Schema question, Michael Kay
    • RE: Schema question, now how to use under CLAX ?Command-line-architecture-(for)XML, David Lyon
      • RE: Schema question, now how to use under CLAX ?Command-line-architecture-(for)XML, Michael Kay
      • RE: Schema question, now how to use under CLAX?Command-line-architecture-(for)XML, David Lyon
      • Re: Schema question, now how to use under CLAX ?Command-line-architecture-(for)XML, Rick Marshall
      • Re: Schema question, now how to use under CLAX ?Command-line-architecture-(for)XML, Florent Georges
• Bussines model idea., Tei
  • Re: Bussines model idea., Tei
• XSD to c structure, suresh chandak
• Re: Clustering Customization Vs Global Standards, Ian Graham
  • RE: Clustering Customization Vs Global Standards, Didier PH Martin
    • Re: Clustering Customization Vs Global Standards, Ian Graham
    • RE: Clustering Customization Vs Global Standards, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
  • RE: Clustering Customization Vs Global Standards, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
• Announce: GUIXML web browser, Alex Selkirk
• RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Kevin Murphy
• Localizable XML description of form, David B
• Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, peter murray-rust
    • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
    • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
    • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, peter murray-rust
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Costello, Roger L.
    • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, David Carlisle
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
• RE: XML Envelopes..., Minas Casiou
• client side XML functionalities, Didier PH Martin
  • RE: client side XML functionalities, Michael Kay
    • RE: client side XML functionalities, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: client side XML functionalities, Manos Batsis
      • Re: client side XML functionalities, andrew welch
      • RE: client side XML functionalities, Didier PH Martin
• Spurious recipient ?, Fraser Goffin
• Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Winchel 'Todd' Vincent III
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Mitch Amiano
    • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Mitch Amiano
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Michael Kay
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Mitch Amiano
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, David Lyon
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML onthe'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, peter murray-rust
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, David Lyon
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, peter murray-rust
      • Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacysupport.. carries business data better.., David Lyon
      • Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.., peter murray-rust
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. somethingwith legacy support.. carries business data better.., David Lyon
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.., peter murray-rust
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. somethingwith legacy support.. carries business data better.., David Lyon
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.., Fraser Goffin
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something withlegacy support.. carries business data better.., Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues..something with legacy support.. carries business data better.., David Lyon
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.., Peter Hunsberger
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. somethingwith legacy support.. carries business data better.., David Lyon
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something withlegacy support.. carries business data better.., Rick Marshall
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. somethingwith legacy support.. carries business data better.., David Lyon
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.., Tei
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.., Chris Burdess
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.., juanrgonzaleza
      • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better.., juanrgonzaleza
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, peter murray-rust
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, peter murray-rust
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, peter murray-rust
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, sterling
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Jirka Kosek
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, bryan rasmussen
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Elliotte Harold
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Anil Philip
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Mukul Gandhi
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Anil Philip
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Michael Kay
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
• RE: google appliance, Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)
  • RE: google appliance, Richard Salz
• google appliance, Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)
  • Re: google appliance, David Lyon
• [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Costello, Roger L.
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Guillaume Lebleu
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Mitch Amiano
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
    • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, sterling
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
    • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Jirka Kosek
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Dave Pawson
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Jirka Kosek
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, bryan rasmussen
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, bryan rasmussen
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Jirka Kosek
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Dave Pawson
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Rick Marshall
    • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, bryan rasmussen
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Tei
      • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, bryan rasmussen
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, peter murray-rust
    • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, peter murray-rust
  • CLAX - Client-side functionality, peter murray-rust
    • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality - OFFTOPIC, Firefoxsupports SVG, Jeff Rafter
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality - OFFTOPIC,Firefox supports SVG, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality - OFFTOPIC, Firefox supports SVG, peter murray-rust
      • OFFTOPIC, Firefox supports SVG, peter murray-rust
    • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Bill Humphries
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, peter murray-rust
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Tei
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, peter murray-rust
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Michael Kay
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
    • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Elliotte Harold
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, peter murray-rust
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Elliotte Harold
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, peter murray-rust
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Tei
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, peter murray-rust
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Philippe Poulard
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, peter murray-rust
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Rick Marshall
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, peter murray-rust
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Mitch Amiano
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, peter murray-rust
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, peter murray-rust
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, juanrgonzaleza
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Paul Topping
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, juanrgonzaleza
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, David Carlisle
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Mitch Amiano
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Julian Reschke
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, peter murray-rust
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Elliotte Harold
      • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Didier PH Martin
      • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Julian Reschke
    • RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
• Streaming Validation for XML: STX goes Schematron, Trapp, Tobias
  • Re: Streaming Validation for XML: STX goes Schematron, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: XML Versioning, Chiusano Joseph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Versioning, Edgardo Luzcando
• XML Versioning, Edgardo Luzcando
  • Re: XML Versioning, Robin La Fontaine
  • Re: XML Versioning, Fraser Goffin
  • Re: XML Versioning, John Kamp
• XML Envelopes..., Minas Casiou
  • Re: XML Envelopes..., Peter Hunsberger
  • Re: XML Envelopes..., Fraser Goffin
• Transforming a DTD to XML, nice nice
  • Parsing XML Schema in Java, nice nice
    • Re: Parsing XML Schema in Java, Mukul Gandhi
    • RE: Parsing XML Schema in Java, Michael Kay
• Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? because XML has not gratefull degradation., Tei
• Re: XSD to code classes converter tools, Boris Kolpackov
• RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'? or Everyone vs Hilton, juanrgonzaleza
• XSD to code classes converter tools, Juerg Tschumperlin
• RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Lindsey, Jack
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)
    • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Michael Kay
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visibleWeb'?, David Lyon
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visibleWeb'?, Michael Kay
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visibleWeb'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visibleWeb'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
    • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Sample XML generator from XML Schema, Kusunam, Srinivas
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visibleWeb'?, sterling
      • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Tei
• RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
  • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, bryan rasmussen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
    • Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Tei
  • RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
    • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Tei
      • RE: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Tei
      • RE: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • X3D is Alive and Well (WAS RE: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?), Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, rita.turkowski@w...
      • RE: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Costello, Roger L.
      • RE: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Michael Kay
      • RE: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Tei
      • RE: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
• [Announce]DataDirect XQuery Webinar Tomorrow (Thursday July 20), DataDirect XQuery
• Pleased help out at Extreme, Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre
• RE: Escape from Paris was: Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Chiusano Joseph
• Escape from Paris was: Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, bryan rasmussen
• "Efficient XML Interchange Measurements" draft made public, Michael Champion
  • Re: "Efficient XML Interchange Measurements" draft made public, Robin Berjon
• RE: Help with terms for kind of schema I'm building, Lindsey, Jack
• PLAN-X 2007: Call for Papers and Demos, Torsten Grust
• Help with terms for kind of schema I'm building, Karr, David
• Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies, Ken North
  • Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas,vocabularies, David Lyon
  • Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas,vocabularies, sterling
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies, Ken North
    • Message not available
      • Re: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies, Ken North
      • Re: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies, adasal
      • Re: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies, Tatu Saloranta
      • Re: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas,vocabularies, sterling
      • Re: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies, Richard Salz
      • Re: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas,vocabularies, Jim Ancona
      • Re: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas,vocabularies, sterling
      • Re: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas,vocabularies, Rick Marshall
      • RE: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies, Michael Kay
      • Re: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas,vocabularies, sterling
      • Re: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies, Tatu Saloranta
      • Re: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas,vocabularies, sterling
      • RE: Re: Patents on XML software, file formats, schemas, vocabularies, Michael Kay
• Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visibleWeb"?, jim.fuller
• Transforming &trade; to &trade;, Sanjay Goel
  • RE: Transforming &trade; to &trade;, Michael Kay
    • Re: Transforming &trade; to &trade;, Sanjay Goel
    • RE: Transforming &trade; to &trade;, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
  • Re: Transforming &trade; to &trade;, Chris Burdess
    • Re: Transforming &trade; to &trade;, andrew welch
• Schema Extension and validation of an instance, Christopher Foley
  • Re: Schema Extension and validation of an instance, George Cristian Bina
  • RE: Schema Extension and validation of an instance, Michael Kay
    • Re: Schema Extension and validation of an instance, Christopher Foley
      • RE: Schema Extension and validation of an instance, Michael Kay
      • RE: Schema Extension and validation of an instance, Minas Casiou
      • Re: Schema Extension and validation of an instance, Christopher Foley
      • Re: Schema Extension and validation of an instance, George Cristian Bina
• [ANN] XML Studio v6-- Web 2.0, Enterprise XML, and Mobile Internettool unification, ALT Mobile
• [ANN] XML Nanny 2.0 with support for RNG, RNC, and Schematron, Todd Ditchendorf
• RE: Basic namespace question, Chiusano Joseph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Basic namespace question, Chiusano Joseph
  • RE: Basic namespace question, Chiusano Joseph
• Basic namespace question, Daniel Gresh
  • RE: Basic namespace question, Michael Kay
  • Re: Basic namespace question, Philippe Poulard
    • Re: Basic namespace question, Daniel Gresh
    • Re: Basic namespace question, sterling
• [ANN] XML Studio v6 --Web 2.0, Enterprise XML, and Mobile Internettool unification, ALT Mobile
• Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Costello, Roger L.
  • RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Greg Alvord
    • Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, bryan rasmussen
  • Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Mukul Gandhi
  • RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Costello, Roger L.
    • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Michael Kay
      • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visibleWeb"?, Colin Muller
      • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visibleWeb"?, sterling
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, bryan rasmussen
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the"visible Web"?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, juanrgonzaleza
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?, Michael Kay
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visibleWeb'?, sterling
      • RE: RE: French History, why french cheese has such anunmistakable smell.., David Lyon
    • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, bryan rasmussen
      • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, bryan rasmussen
    • RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Costello, Roger L.
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Michael Kay
    • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Tei
    • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Richard Salz
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the"visible Web"?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Mukul Gandhi
    • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visibleWeb"?, Elliotte Harold
    • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visibleWeb"?, Dave Pawson
    • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visibleWeb"?, Guillaume Lebleu
      • Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visibleWeb"?, David Lyon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Chris Gray
    • RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Didier PH Martin
      • RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?, Chris Gray
• Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, juanrgonzaleza
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, juanrgonzaleza
    • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, David Carlisle
      • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, juanrgonzaleza
      • HTML 5 vs XHTML 2 (was: The Best Technologies Don't Win), Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: HTML 5 vs XHTML 2 (was: The Best Technologies Don't Win), Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: HTML 5 vs XHTML 2 (was: The Best Technologies Don't Win), Bjoern Hoehrmann
      • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, David Carlisle
  • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, juanrgonzaleza
    • RE: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
  • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, juanrgonzaleza
• Default namespace for attributes?, Mukul Gandhi
  • Re: Default namespace for attributes?, Martin Probst
  • Re: Default namespace for attributes?, Ian Graham
    • Re: Default namespace for attributes?, Mukul Gandhi
  • Re: Default namespace for attributes?, Jirka Kosek
    • Re: Default namespace for attributes?, Mukul Gandhi
      • Re: Default namespace for attributes?, Jirka Kosek
      • RE: Default namespace for attributes?, Michael Kay
    • Re: Default namespace for attributes?, Mukul Gandhi
      • Re: Default namespace for attributes?, David Carlisle
  • Re: Default namespace for attributes?, Dimitre Novatchev
    • Re: Re: Default namespace for attributes?, Mukul Gandhi
• Announce: XPontus XML Editor 1.0.0RC1, Yves Zoundi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Announce: XPontus XML Editor 1.0.0RC1, Yves Zoundi
• Announce: XPontus XML Editor, Yves Zoundi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Announce: XPontus XML Editor, Yves Zoundi
• Re: Copying text from a source, then converting to XML, Daniel Gresh
• RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Paul Topping
  • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Dave Pawson
    • RE: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Paul Topping
  • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, juanrgonzaleza
    • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Henri Sivonen
      • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Rick Jelliffe
• Copying text from a source, then converting to XML, Daniel Gresh
  • Re: Copying text from a source, then converting to XML, Mukul Gandhi
• the fall of XPath over filesystem, Oleg A. Paraschenko
• XSD Imports with location, Ramkumar Menon
• Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Winchel 'Todd' Vincent III
  • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Richard Salz
    • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Dave Pawson
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, David Lyon
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, David Lyon
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Richard Salz
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, David Lyon
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Richard Salz
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Dave Pawson
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Mitch Amiano
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Dave Pawson
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Mitch Amiano
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Fraser Goffin
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Dave Pawson
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Pete Cordell
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Richard Salz
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Pete Cordell
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Dave Pawson
      • Re: md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Richard Salz
• md5sum / sha1sum for XML?, Dave Pawson
• Article: "Manage XML data sets for security", Uche Ogbuji
• Parsing an RDFS file, nice nice
• Announce: TeXML 2.0, Oleg A. Paraschenko
  • Re: Announce: TeXML 2.0, Elliotte Harold
    • Re: Announce: TeXML 2.0, Oleg A. Paraschenko
• RE: [x3d] Re: [x3d-public] Important FLUX Announcement, Len Bullard
• Call for Presentations - OASIS Adoption Forum, Jane Harnad
• FW: Extreme Markup Languages 2006 -the place to be in August for people who think about markup, Marion Elledge
• RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, juanrgonzaleza
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
• RE: Parsing an RDFS file, nice nice
  • RE: Parsing an RDFS file, nice nice
• [ANN] Kernow 1.4, andrew welch
• FOAF in SOAP, andthereitgoes
• Transforming a DTD to XML syntax (Tree), nice nice
• Extreme webcasts, Elliotte Harold
  • Re: Extreme webcasts, B Tommie Usdin
  • The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
    • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, juanrgonzaleza
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Soumitra Sengupta
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Robert Koberg
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, juanrgonzaleza
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Michael Kay
      • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Jirka Kosek
      • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, andrew welch
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
    • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, bryan rasmussen
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Michael Kay
      • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, bryan rasmussen
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Tahir Hashmi
    • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Elliotte Harold
      • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Danny Ayers
    • Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win, sterling
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, sterling
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
      • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win, David Lyon
• FYI: monmason@m... doesn't want to be on this list, Webmaster
  • Re: FYI: monmason@m... doesn't want to be on this list, Ken North
  • Re: FYI: monmason@m... doesn't want to be on this list, Mitch Amiano
• trying to use abs(), Webmaster
  • Re: trying to use abs(), Mukul Gandhi
    • Re: trying to use abs(), David Carlisle
      • Re: trying to use abs(), Dimitre Novatchev
  • Parsing an RDFS file, nice nice
    • Re: Parsing an RDFS file, Jan Algermissen
      • Re: Parsing an RDFS file, nice nice
• RE: Math on the web without MathML (CSS 2.1 rendering for HTML and XML), Webmaster
  • RE: abs() function (was random title borrowed from another thread), Michael Kay
• Extreme Markup Languages 2006 - Final Program Posted, B Tommie Usdin
• Re: Problem with AJAX and Expression Engine, Mitch Amiano
• Math on the web without MathML (CSS 2.1 rendering for HTML and XML), juanrgonzaleza
• RE: xsd and org.apache.commons.digester.Digester, Darren Hall
  • RE: xsd and org.apache.commons.digester.Digester, Michael Kay
• OFFTOPIC: Planet Quest, Len Bullard
  • Re: OFFTOPIC: Planet Quest, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: Planet Quest, Bob Foster
      • Re: OFFTOPIC: Planet Quest, Eric van der Vlist
    • RE: OFFTOPIC: Planet Quest, Len Bullard
• Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Rick Jelliffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Michael Kay
    • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Michael Champion
      • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Rick Jelliffe
      • Hijacked XSD permathread - was Re: Restrictions on existenceof attributes?, Michael Champion
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Ken North
    • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Michael Champion
      • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, James Fuller
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Jack Lindsey
    • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Michael Kay
    • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Michael Kay
      • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Jack Lindsey
      • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Eric van der Vlist
      • XPointer example, tom tom
      • Re: XPointer example, David Carlisle
      • Re: XPointer example, Florent Georges
      • Re: XPointer example, tom tom
      • Re: XPointer example, Frans Englich
  • RE: Restrictions on existence of attributes?, Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)
• Namespaces and attributes.., Evert | Collab
  • Message not available
    • Re: Namespaces and attributes.., Evert | Collab
      • RE: Namespaces and attributes.., Michael Kay
      • Re: Namespaces and attributes.., Dennis Sosnoski
      • Message not available
      • Re: Namespaces and attributes.., Evert | Collab
• Returned mail: Data format error, dave