[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: NVDL as a dispatching architecture
Tatu> This approach is obviously less generic than NVDL, but Tatu> seems reasonable for efficient validation within Tatu> context of stax (pull) processing. I am not sure if your approach is less generic. At a first glance, NVDL looks complicated but I would not be surprised if your approach can be safely extended for handling NVDL. NVDL implementations have been built using SAX. However, it is not easy tell, by reading the NVDL spec, whether NVDL is implementable using SAX. To the contrary, most people will suppose that it is not. The same thing might apply to pull-based implementations. Having said this, a single <namespace> element of NVDL having more than one <validate> element might be a problem for pull-based NVDL implementations. We have to allow a single start tag to be *pulled" by more than one validator. Cheers, -- MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@a...>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|