[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Validation of missing elements in xml:
Probably you are right. I think I was thinking on the right track, because xs:token is derived from xs:string! Regards, Mukul On 4/5/06, Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...> wrote: > Hi Mukul, > > Le mardi 04 avril 2006 à 16:04 +0530, Mukul Gandhi a écrit : > > On 4/4/06, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...> wrote: > > > > > <xs:simpleType name="mystring"> > > > <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> > > > <xs:minLength value="1"/> > > > <xs:pattern value="[A-Za-z]{1,} *[A-Za-z]{1,}"/> > > > </xs:restriction> > > > </xs:simpleType> > > > > Sorry, there is no need of <xs:minLength value="1"/> > > I am not convinced that > > <xs:simpleType name="mystring"> > <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> > <xs:pattern value="<<magic regular expression here>>"/> > </xs:restriction> > </xs:simpleType> > > could be considered better (or simpler) than: > > <xs:simpleType name="mystring"> > <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> > <xs:minLength value="1"/> > </xs:restriction> > </xs:simpleType> > > If your regular expression was right, you could allow the same set of > text nodes but I don't really see the benefit... > > Eric > > -- > GPG-PGP: 2A528005 > Lisez-moi sur XMLfr. > http://xmlfr.org/index/person/eric+van+der+vlist/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com > (ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax > (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|