[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Inversion of control (was: DOM's javascript roots (was Re:
On Apr 26, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Tatu Saloranta wrote: > Yes, but only if you actually enjoy having to > implement your stack handlers, dispatchers etc. > Pull-parsing removes requirement for such glue code; > keeping track of context can be done by normal method > calls, hence recursive-descent (but without a need for > an in-memory tree model like DOM). Ahh. I see from your last 2 posts that you're really a proponent of pull-parsing. I can't fault you for that because for many things, it *is* more natural. I've built up enough of a SAX base that I don't feel compelled to move to it though.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|