[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XML Performance in a Transacation
--- Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote: > XSLT processing isn't O(n^2) either. Many > transformations run in linear > time. Of course it's very easy for a user to write > XSLT applications that > are O(n^2) or worse - and it would be wrong to make > it difficult! Hmmmh. Would it? It would be great if, of functionally equivalent choices, it would be more intuitive and easier to choose the one with better performance characteristics (in cases where it matters). That is, to try to avoid making "wrong" choices too tempting. I assume XSLT usage has many parallels to SQL usage -- in both cases there are lots of ways of using things more efficiently. Just as with parsing, getting more information on clean efficient usage patterns would go a long way towards better actual end-to-end performance. -+ Tatu +- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|