[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
Hi. > > Oh dear. If the data binding folks are going to be stakeholders > > in this, we can throw out all hopes of a clean design. They'll > > mess it up even worse than the relational people did. > > I think this is an argument for letting Schematron do what it > does well, and letting XSD do what it does .... uhh ... > sortof tolerably after a couple of beers. LOL!!! > That is, whatever > databinding contract you get from a schema, get from XSD; if > you need path constraints in your actual data contract, do so > with Schematron, and if you think you want both you are > basically S.O.L. Vendors and standards orgs should focus on > getting them to work together cleanly, not trying to get one > to subsume the other. I heard someone mention (and I can't remember where or when... but it's not my original idea) the idea of having standards for a validation warning/error format. When validation was done on an instance, it would result in a document snippet that represented the results of that pass of validation. Snippets could be concatenated from several validation steps, and the result would be a coherent report on the validity of the instance. Is something along those lines what you mean when you say "getting them [schematron and XSD] to work together cleanly"? -------------->Nathan > > > > > ________________________________ > >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|