[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: XML Performance in a Transacation

• To: Jaakko Kangasharju <jkangash@h...>
• Subject: Re: Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
• From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:25:18 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <tt364m443qz.fsf_-_@l...>
• References: <31980.60.229.226.213.1143118064.squirrel@i...> <auto-000097183407@m...> <20060324062228.591b7e8d.olpa@x...> <442378B6.5060206@a...> <442382C8.9030906@z...> <442397C4.1070704@a...> <tt364m443qz.fsf_-_@l...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Just the sort of unexpected approach Rick's proposed contest is intended 
to smoke out! Your reference has convinced me Rick is onto something.

Bob

Jaakko Kangasharju wrote:
> Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> writes:
> 
> 
>>Last year I think there were reports of good speed ups in parsing in
>>Java jsut from re-using SAX objects. (I think the research was
>>academic from Eastern Europe, sorry no references.)
> 
> 
> Do you mean the paper "An Adaptive, Fast and Safe XML Parser Based on
> Byte Sequences Memorization" (http://www2005.org/cdrom/docs/p692.pdf)
> by Toshiro Takase and others that was at the WWW conference last year?
> Their parser caches the SAX events generated from a sequence of bytes
> and then replays those events when encountering the same bytes (of
> course taking into account context like prefix mappings).  They report
> speedups of up to 70% compared to Piccolo.
> 

• References:
  • Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
    • From: "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa@x...>
  • Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
    • From: Jaakko Kangasharju <jkangash@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
• Next by Date: Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
• Next by thread: Re: XML Performance in a Transacation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread