[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Sr. XML Analyst position available

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Sr. XML Analyst position available
• From: "Shifrin, Laurel \(LNG-HBE\)" <Laurel.Shifrin@l...>
• Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 12:54:07 -0500
• Thread-index: AcZDonXwxdAvL4C6Rg6yJ0pP2IZoIw==
• Thread-topic: Sr. XML Analyst position available

Sr XML Analyst
Location: any of the following:
Dayton, OH
Newark, NJ
Bethesda, MD
Charlottesville, VA
Albany, NY
San Francisco, CA
Colorado Springs, CO
Responsibilities
This position exists to support LexisNexis' move to XML for editorial and product delivery systems by leading the development of XML DTDs/schemas and architectural designs and principles. Responsibilities include:

1. Help customers define their requirements.
2. Run data modeling workshops to develop XML DTDs & schemas.
3. Develop editorial tools and products that use XML.
4. Write documentation, presentations and training materials specific to our DTDs and DTD design principles.
5. Research/participate in industry standard initiatives.

Qualifications
Travel required.

1. Three years+ experience with writing XML DTDs, strong knowledge of related standards
2. One or more core programming languages (particularly XSLT, Perl, Omnimark, Java)
3. Experience with legal data is desirable.
4. Knowledge of XML industry products and tools is desirable.
5. Ability to work independently, creatively and strategically.
6. Must have strong analytical and problem solving skills.
7. Requires both presentations & documentation, so good oral and written communication skills are a must. As the job involves organizing and running analytical workshops, good presentation and meeting skills are a must.
8. Ability to explain technical issues to customers and customer/editorial issues to technical developers.

Interested candidates may apply at: http://www.lexisnexis.com/employment

• Prev by Date: RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• Next by Date: Re: Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
• Previous by thread: Problems with CDATA
• Next by thread: RE: voting machines
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread