[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Two Questions - on XML Schema

• To: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>, <Paul.V.Biron@k...>
• Subject: Re: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:16:50 -0000
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>, <xmlschema-dev@w...>,<xmlschema-dev-request@w...>
• References: <E1FHQT5-000736-83@a...> <002201c643af$66f52f00$0600a8c0@RW>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...>
To: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>; <Paul.V.Biron@k...>


> Original Message From: "Michael Kay"

>> Oh dear. If the data binding folks are going to be stakeholders in this,
>> we
>> can throw out all hopes of a clean design. They'll mess it up even worse
>> than the relational people did.
>
> Gee thanks.  I was just about to ask some questions about these various
> approaches, but don't think I'll bother.

Um, on reflection I might have over reacted there.  But let's face it, slurs
don't come bigger than that :-)

Mind you, I always thought it was the doc-heads that messed it up.  At least
I know who to blame now!

Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
                         for XML to C++ data binding visit
                         http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
                         (or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
=============================================

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Two Questions - on XML Schema
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Sr. XML Analyst position available
• Next by Date: RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• Previous by thread: Re: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• Next by thread: RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread