[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir Act
Yep. And the Pragmatic Web on top of the Semantic Web. But that will resolve in saying 'REST isn't enough'. The trick is to keep from mixing up the mail man with the tax man. len From: Peter Hunsberger [mailto:peter.hunsberger@g...] The problem seems to be why Len raises the pragmatics question, it's certainly one of my favourite rants: local semantics don't solve anything but local problems and global discovery is costly. Or to put it another way, the higher up the food chain you attempt to do your modelling the harder it is to make everyone happy. So back we go to the permathreads on how to build the Semantic Web. I happen to have pointers to two of my previous ramblings on this at hand: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200411/msg00198.html http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200411/msg00161.html So I'll skip rehashing this territory and instead ponder the question of what already exists to identify definitions? Are there some standard name spaces on a couple of simple tags to frame anything we think that hits upon a definition of anything else without having to resort to breaking simple discourse into RDF. Eg: <swdef:concept name="vegetable">some long random ramblings</swdef:concept> Essentially, explicit but informal (latent?) semantic metadata for bottom up search engine type discovery. Of course that doesn't solve the naming question until it's propagated for a couple billion web pages but it's a start...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|