[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Invitation to metadata dictionary wiki - meaningfuel.org
Not crowds, but feedback, aka, 'wrong rock or right rock'. It requires a means to remember results and pose alternatives. It would be interesting to take any topic and watch the evolution of the 'selectors' and 'selectors of selectors' in a wikipedia entry system. "Self-selected" and "Selected by selectors" is a common hierarchy for evolving systems. That may be a pattern of 'input in a smart way' (see first and second order cybernetic systems). The crowd is mass storage and a read/write head. "It" happens because interested parties have access and edit rights. "It" fails when they know enough to choose a "medical scalpel" over a "graphical scalpel" but don't know which grip to apply. So selection and practice matter. In music, it's a "good instrument plus chops" and if one has to pick one, "chops" are more important. Would you let a crowd choose your spouse for you? I did. It worked. Picking the right crowd was the secret. :-) len From: Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco) [mailto:natyoung@c...] The scalpel a surgeon uses today is very much the result of "wisdom of the crowds". Which points to how thoroughly "wisdom of the crowds" is a misnomer. Does it capture: - if you take input in a smart way (more of an art than a science) you can do better work than you could alone. - for some problems there are very reliable solutions that involve analyzing the behavior of a carefully selected group in a very specific way - there can be working modes that incorporate multiple reviews and revisions that result in very very good results All of this begs the question: How does it happen?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|