[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Common Word Processing Format
On 2 Dec 2005, at 09:20, Michael Kay wrote: >> <div class="monty"> >> <span class="python"/> >> </div class"monty"> > I've recently seen people trying to use the latter approach for adding > extensibility to financial messages, in the apparent belief that > writing > xs:any in a schema was somehow against the spirit of things. Something I'm seeing more and more are examples of XML documents that are effectively name-value pairs because they want to describe their data in Schema but can't put a minOccurs="0" ahead of the slurping vortex that is xs:any. And then there is the adverse effect that xs:any has in a number of databinding tools.. <person> <value name="title">Mr</value> <value name="first">Monty</value> <value name="last">Python</value> </person> seems to be a typical work-round - and the worst of both worlds. Paul -- http://blog.whatfettle.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|