[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Automated schema migration
Right. That question isn't about innovation using existing standards. Standards are a means to create a Nash equilibrium. Innovation is a means to break it and set off a network effect. It snaps interoperability but that is the point of an open trading system. I'm certainly not against open standards or even methodologies. It is occasionally useful and relaxing to think outside the box. len From: David Carver [mailto:d_a_carver@y...] You best bet is probably to look at some of the existing Schema Design methodologies and their corresponding schemas. Instead of trying to re-invent the wheel, you might find something that you can use in OASIS UBL repository or the OAG's (Open Application Group). OAG definitely promotes component reuse, and provides a standard BOD design methodology that can be applied to your various business requirements. If you are in the electronics industry you might want to check out RosettaNet and see if their messages will work. The advantage to using these message formats is that you start to standardize the messages, and your trading partners or internal business entities can start communicating in a standard format. It all depends on how much leway you have in redesigning your existing Schemas.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|