[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Common Word Processing Format
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Going long here. Sorry. > > We seem to be able to use MS Word here to do that. We rely on: > > o Templates (not much more than a copy of the outline with the styles set) > > o Common sense (don't be creative and the styleGoons won't come to see you). What happens when you want to change the Templates style corporation wide for a set of docs - say a copyright footer change (copy and paste into the new template?)? What happens when you want to change what has been sent to the client (rather than what can be viewed by a client)? > > Controlling the chimps is expensive and the bonobos won't pay attention > anyway so don't waste your time or money. > > Lots of things are going on here including politics that would make > NicTheMach proud, but the trouble is we really don't have a way to > say when something is > > a) open b) open enough c) good enough you said not to talk about the politics :) Sure there is politics - OO is trying to unwedge MSFT. There are those who care deeply one way or the other and those who just want to get their assignment done. I just think the whole model of a MSWord, OOWrite or PDF [expletive deleted]. I can't understand why the luminaries are pushing for one or the other (oh right, the politics) over better, more useful, future proof systems. best, -Rob
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|