[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XML-with-datatypes (was....)
New entrants to the space are one reason for permathreads. Then there is the occasional checking of old ideas to see if any new merit has obtained. Then there is the joy of rehashing: the rules for baseball don't change, but it is still fun to play for the exercise. Well-practiced games and technologies such as XML settle into attractor orbits (aka, permathreads). That makes them dull news so the artificial luminaries go away. At that point, the list resumes its communal and educational nature, and while the pretty people are looking elsewhere, something magical can happen. I'm trying to figure out what the heck monoids are before XML 2005 in Atlanta. Maybe if I can understand it here, we can discuss it there. Anyone care to tutor on that topic? The wikipedia explanation is dense and my math won't cut it. I'm a dull blade but I've a strong handle. On the other hand, I think there is still a lot about applying XML that isn't universally understood such as Steve DeRose explains in the article Elliotte referenced, that new technologies such as the hardware accelerators open up new possibilities, and that as long as we keep this list hashing the threads, any refactoring that is needed will be well-understood before it is undertaken. Remember, comp-text-sgml plowed the field for xml-dev by creating the chorus and enabling the luminaries to spot the technically talented and the usefully vocal. len From: Peter Hunsberger [mailto:peter.hunsberger@g...] A has been been observed, it seems that this thread is 80% perma but it amazes me that it's been over two years since this comment:
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|