[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: [ANN] Candle 0.8 - a new scripting language for XML
> Candle is different from XML in syntax in many ways, but all with > rationale behind them, we don't want to re-invent just to be > different. I think that what you've done looks interesting, and I will be interested to see what happens to it. There are some interesting questions of presentation/marketing. If you stress the similarities to XML, you risk antagonizing the people who understand the value of XML conformance; if you chose instead to stress the differences, you might find the product became more attractive to those who understand XML's technical weaknesses (sometimes these are the same people). Many of the things you are saying amount to the fact that XML has gradually become rather a mess, and it is need of refactoring. Perhaps it really is time that as a community we started to think about doing it again, and doing it better next time. Personally, I suspect we haven't quite reached that point yet: the benefits of conformance are still too high. I'd give it another five years. One thing I'm pretty sure of, though, is that a "son-of-XML" doesn't stand much chance without a broad consensus behind it, and that's not going to come from one smart product lobbed in to the marketplace from the sidelines. I haven't had a chance to study the detail. Namespaces are a mess that needs sorting out, but if we're going to sort them out, a lot of discussion is needed to agree on how it is done. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|