[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: DTDs still widely used ? was RE: Namespaces A Mess?


RE:  DTDs still widely used ? was RE: Namespaces A Mess?


On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) wrote:
> bryan rasmussen writes:
>> A very unscientific quick check on the usage of DTDs...
> Your search looks for XML documents on the public web that have the word
> "doctype" and are in Google's index, which is not a good indicator of how
> much XML people are using that points to DTDs.

In this regard, I'd also wonder how frequent it is that XML documents do 
not contain any DOCTYPE declarations, but are neveretheless maintained as 
valid w.r.t. to some external DTDs?  (The same wonder applies to the other 
schema languages, of course.)

VG


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.