[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?

• To: xml dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?
• From: Anil Philip <goodnewsforyou@y...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 09:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=V8GXXrJMZNnLfaiIbh5q7VKEl+8l7CvuEE8n4E89GMY2vNgq/wUinou6Xa6wqJve1i+wknJqEhVO59co5BJ8P9r2vaeht77j0gHKbzn1Jnt51jsPEOUNJ8Cc5VBam4kb875fR/zTS5cWeBqjIx7DcGTkp48vUqTGBcMjuueFKVI= ;
• In-reply-to: <20050914160159.95764.qmail@w...>

Hello,
I would agree that XML is human readable and that
XML+HTML is probably better than HTML. However, I was
wondering:
When we used C, (I guess there's an entire generation
that didnt need to learn it :)), one transferred data
using structs.
eg.
/* from memory... */
struct Foo {
int i;
char[] str;
long j;
};

The Sender and Receiver were tied into explicitly
knowing about Foo's structure - and so were considered
tightly coupled, a bad thing.

With XML, one is sending the description together with
the data in a tagged text file. However, in most cases
of data transfer, the code of both Sender and Receiver
still has to know the structure of Foo especially when
parsing the data file. So how is it more flexible or
even better? (apart from endian stuff)
thanks,
Anil Philip
-

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchangingdata?
    • From: sterling <sstouden@t...>

• References:
  • Re: XSLT 2.0: Definition of a structure and its use
    • From: "Agnisys Technology \(P\) Ltd." <agnisys@y...>

• Prev by Date: Goodbye XML-Deviant
• Next by Date: RE: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0: Definition of a structure and its use
• Next by thread: Re: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchangingdata?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread