[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?


unstructured information definition
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
> On 8/11/05, Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...> wrote:
> 
>>Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>>
>>>...
>>>HTML is the example many think they understand.
>>>HTML is not just a presentational vocabulary.
>>>META tags, for example, are not presentational.
>>>FORM tags aren't strictly presentational.  Even
>>>DIVs aren't strictly presentational.  In fact,
>>>almost any tag has aspects of presentation and
>>>content (note I am not using the term 'semantic'
>>>here because presentation is a semantic). The
>>>principle 'separation of presentation and content'
>>>is flaky in practice.
>>>...
>>
>>hi, Claude
>>
>>IMHO, presentation is not semantic : semantic is used for terms that
>>means something ; you will say that "<b>" and "<i>" means "bold" and
>>"italic", but as a meaning of a tag applies on its content, you can't
>>say that :
>>"my name is <b>Philippe Poulard</b>" has not the same meaning that :
>>"my name is Philippe Poulard" ;
> 
> 
> Sure you can: the code that decides how to display the two will most
> likely decide they have different meaning.... Semantics aren't just
> for humans any more!
> 
> <snip>conclusions that follow from the assumption that only humans
> care about the meaning of tags</snip>

ok, let's have more info : instead of <b>, let's use <xhtml:b> (with the 
right namespace declaration) ; one can decide that <b> is used for 
naming of a person (why not, even if it is certainly a bad choice), but 
one can't decide the same for <xhtml:b>, because it really stands for 
"bold" and nothing else

a code that respect standards will no longer decide what <xhtml:b> is for

> 
>>the real question is not about "structured or unstructured" information,
>>because by definition markup languages ARE structured, but rather about
>>"semantic or not semantic" : XML as well RDBMS may structure both
>>semantic and non-semantic information
>>
> 
> 
> Respectfully disagree: structure and semantics are in the eye of the
> beholder: tell me is a blob of XML stored in a RDB structured or not? 
> Does the same blob have any semantic meaning? What if the RDB can
> parse the blob into a SOAP descriptor? What if it used a grammar
> stored in another blob to do so?
> 

if the semantic structure of a blob in an RDBMS tells that it is XML, 
then it is structured (whether this structure is easily accessible or 
not is another story)

-what about reading an XML file as binary data ?
-what about reading the files where are stored the tables of your RDBMS 
in a vendor-dependant binary format ?

if you ignore the structure, you won't have structured data

-- 
Cordialement,

            ///
           (. .)
  -----ooO--(_)--Ooo-----
|   Philippe Poulard    |
  -----------------------

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.