[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
Doug Rudder wrote: > One can make (and many scientists have made) a solid, logical, and truly > scientific argument that evolutionary theory itself is more religion than > science. Your comments are extremely religious in nature; No, it's not quite the same. There's an interesting interview of Douglas Adams on the topic which pretty much conveys what I would consider to be a sensible view here: """ I donâ??t accept the currently fashionable assertion that any view is automatically as worthy of respect as any equal and opposite view. My view is that the moon is made of rock. If someone says to me â??Well, you havenâ??t been there, have you? You havenâ??t seen it for yourself, so my view that it is made of Norwegian Beaver Cheese is equally validâ? - then I canâ??t even be bothered to argue. (...) All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others. """ -- Douglas Adams, http://www.americanatheist.org/win98-99/T2/silverman.html > This is not the place for (...) religious fervor. Namespaces rule! Binary XML [expletive deleted]! The W3C are evil! -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|