[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Web 2.0 - Leading the Web to its full potential by side-st
* Gerald Bauer wrote: > Also allow me to highlight that pretty much all Web 2.0 innovations >side step the W3C bureaucracy and its self-styled visionaries and >leaders e.g. > > o XmlHttpRequest - A innovation introduced by - suprise, suprise - Microsoft > o User JavaScripts - A innovation introduced by Firefox Hackers > o Web Graphics Using Canvas Tag and JavaScript - A innovation introduced by Apple Well, it seems few people realize that Microsoft's Internet Explorer is an extremely rich platform; XMLHTTPRequest had to be discoved long after it was available, few people are aware that IE ships with a vector graphics implementation or that it supports compound document formats such as HTML+SMIL. The same goes for "User JavaScripts", IE4 allowed to use scripts inside style sheets and supported user style sheets which some people used to create "User JavaScripts". I've used it for example to add class attributes to specific documents so I can filter out stuff or change annoying styles more easily. It also provided "Web Graphics Using Canvas Tag and JavaScript" though not depending on proprietary features but standard HTML-extensibility means like the <object> element. Unlike the <canvas> element it is also not limited to simple 2D graphics, standard 3D models can easily be used, animated, etc. http://www.mgifos.demon.co.uk/ has examples. The competing vendors aren't really innovating here, they are trying to catch up. So this "Web 2.0" seems to be the web of 1997. And I'm not sure how the W3C is relevant here, "In discussions, it was agreed that further extending HTML 4.0 would be difficult, as would converting 4.0 to be an XML application. The proposed way to break free of these restrictions is to make a fresh start with the next generation of HTML based upon a suite of XML tag-sets." -- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/future/ Seven years later we are still waiting for this next generation of HTML, and, much worse, XHTML 2.0 is not going to address the problems it was supposed to address, "at this time the Working Group has no ready solution" to address extensibility in XHTML 2.0, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2005AprJun/0067 XHTML 2.0 isn't really backed by consensus in the community either, Ian Hickson notes "I disagree with many of XHTML2's design decisions" I am not sure though where he got those design decisions from, it seems "XHTML2" and "design" are basically as unrelated as "W3C HTML Working Group" and "W3C Process". "What on earth is going on inside "the club"? Can't someone put a "bomb" in there that blows them all out into reality?" -- Jan Roland Eriksson on www-html. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@h... · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|