[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > That and a bit of maturity from the professionals. Maturity? Gee Len, you want us all out of a job or what? :) > How often > do we go into these meetings prepared to skewer a submission > because of the source? By example, wasn't the original > submission for XSD from Microsoft a lot simpler than XSD? > Wasn't the VML submission a lot simpler than SVG? There are a few things about XDR (assuming that's what you mean? the previous one was quite seriously more complex IIRC) that I dislike but overall it's generally better than WXS for sure. Regarding VML, it sure was simple but not only in the positive connotations of the word. I wasn't there at the time but I don't think the SVG WG had anything against Microsoft, in fact VML was pretty much integrated into SVG, just as PGML. The problems that SVG went were pretty much Version One and Space Odyssey. Thankfully the mobile industry is providing the impetus to rationalize all that. > After all, it's fun to travel, see one's name in the trades > and on the covers of the specs, get lecturing gigs, get > to drink with one's heros, and destroy hotel rooms without > having to learn new material. It's always nice to see some great people, and WGs sure have their share of those. But every hotel room looks the same these days so thrashing them gets a bit tired after the third time around. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|