[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0

• To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:15:21 +0100
• Cc: Michael Kay <mike@s...>, 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <430647A3.30304@e...>
• References: <20050818233419.DD71FD6EFD@m...> <430647A3.30304@e...>
• Reply-to: davep@d...

On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 22:57 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote:

> IMHO a large part of the problem here is that there are too few checks 
> during the Working Draft phase, which puts an enormous strain on Last 
> Call, resulting over time in the practice now increasingly common of 
> having multiple LCs, or of going to CR then back to LC, or giving up and 
> making a Note out of it, etc.
> 
> Suggestions on how to improve the process in that regard would be very 
> welcome.

Perhaps that bit of XP that overlaps with OS?
Release small, release often?
Frequent minor releases (for public comment) during the WD phase?

The hope being that the daft bits would be picked up by the public?
(E.g. mandating XSD links in XHTML 2.0?)

regards DaveP.

• References:
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: RE: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: RE: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: RE: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread